By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It only takes a minute to sign up. How can i do a model averaged for a negative binomial model. I try with the AICcmodavg but it is not compatible with glm. Any help would be appreciated Thank you very much Magdalena.

The general procedure is to compute an information theoretic criterion e. AICand use it to compute weights which can then be used to average model predictions, or sometimes model parameters. A great book on the subject is. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. I am not very familiar with negative binomial models, however I tried to make an example using the example in the help page of the function glm.

What is michael reeves twitch channel up to join this community.

The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Model-averaged for a glm. Asked 1 year, 11 months ago. Active 1 year, 11 months ago. Viewed times. Magdalena Arias Magdalena Arias 1 1 1 bronze badge. Active Oldest Votes. The Overflow Blog. Q2 Community Roadmap. The Overflow How many jobs can be done at home?

Featured on Meta. Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response…. Feedback on Q2 Community Roadmap. Related 6. Hot Network Questions. Cross Validated works best with JavaScript enabled.Model selection: AIC or hypothesis testing z-statistics, drop1anova. Model validation: Use normalized or Pearson residuals as in Ch 4 or deviance residuals default in Rwhich give similar results except for zero-inflated data.

I sampled mosquitoes in 38 sites of varying vegetation cover and microclimate. I am most interested in Aedes albopictusthe main disease vector species found in this study. I want to investigate the relationship between my environmental covariates and 1 the presence of Aedes albopictusand 2 the proportion of Aedes albo individuals out of the total trap count of mosquitoes. Students in the course can download the data from our Canvas site into a data folder in their working directory.

The count and proportion data are definitely zero-inflated. The highest values that are up for evaluation as outliers are not considerably larger than the others, so I am going to keep them.

I will use the standard link function logit.

**Prediction in Simple Regression**

Both logit and probit link functions assume that you have approximately an equal number of zeros and ones…and I do! Looks like minimum temperature is not significant when Vegetation is included. I can use a likelihood ratio test to determine whether the model without minimum temperature is better.

## Getting started with Negative Binomial Regression Modeling

Big realization: I probably need to deal with nonlinear responses in my data. I expect that there will be a density of Aedes around species-specific optimal conditions. I am also interested in general changes in mosquito abundance across the land use gradient. A few studies have shown an increase in overall abundance with forest cover. What to do? As expected, I have a significant result. I can calculate the explained deviance as the authors do in section 9.

Given that the dispersion parameter is 1, this suggests that I do not have to worry about overdispersion. Next, validation: We need to take the residuals of choice e. We do not want to see any patterns in these graphs. If we do, then there is something wrong, and we need to work out what it is.

Q2: What are potential reasons for choosing between a quasi-Poisson model or negative binomial model to deal with overdispersion? Q3: I thought these 2 chapters had a lot of information to take in…what are your questions? Offset: equation 9. Bernoulli GLM for binary presence-absence data Table Binomial GLM for proportional data Model on p.

Analysis Example My data: I sampled mosquitoes in 38 sites of varying vegetation cover and microclimate. The data for the purpose of this exercise include: Presence of Aedes albopictus in sites Proportion of Aedes albopictus out of total mosquitoes trapped Mosquito abundance data Covariates of interest: vegetation cover, average annual minimum temperature I want to investigate the relationship between my environmental covariates and 1 the presence of Aedes albopictusand 2 the proportion of Aedes albo individuals out of the total trap count of mosquitoes.

LR test by dropping each term shows that Vegetation should be retained. GLM for count data I am also interested in general changes in mosquito abundance across the land use gradient.When it comes to modeling counts ie, whole numbers greater than or equal to 0we often start with Poisson regression. This is a generalized linear model where a response is assumed to have a Poisson distribution conditional on a weighted sum of predictors. For example, we might model the number of documented concussions to NFL quarterbacks as a function of snaps played and the total years experience of his offensive line.

However one potential drawback of Poisson regression is that it may not accurately describe the variability of the counts. When we see this happen with data that we assume or hope is Poisson distributed, we say we have under- or overdispersion, depending on if the variance is smaller or larger than the mean.

One approach that addresses this issue is Negative Binomial Regression. The negative binomial distribution, like the Poisson distribution, describes the probabilities of the occurrence of whole numbers greater than or equal to 0. Unlike the Poisson distribution, the variance and the mean are not equivalent.

This suggests it might serve as a useful approximation for modeling counts with variability different from its mean. The variance of a negative binomial distribution is a function of its mean and has an additional parameter, kcalled the dispersion parameter. Say our count is random variable Y from a negative binomial distribution, then the variance of Y is.

As the dispersion parameter gets larger and larger, the variance converges to the same value as the mean, and the negative binomial turns into a Poisson distribution. The data are presented in Table The data are from a survey of people in which they were asked how many homicide victims they know.

The variables are respthe number of victims the respondent knows, and racethe race of the respondent black or white. Does race help explain how many homicide victims a person knows? The data first needs to be entered into R :. First we notice most respondents are white:. On to model fitting. First we try Poisson regression using the glm function and show a portion of the summary output.

Race is very significant. It appears blacks are much more likely to know someone who was a victim of a homicide. But what does the coefficient 1.

In this simple model with one dichotomous predictor, it is the difference in log expected counts. If we exponentiate the coefficient we get a ratio of sample means:.

In fact if we make a prediction with this model and exponentiate the results, we get the sample means:. This says the count of known victims for whites is distributed as a Poisson with mean and variance equal to 0. Above we first saved the predicted means into an object called fmeans.

We then generated fitted counts by using the dpois function along with the estimated means to predict the probability of getting 0 through 6. We then multiplied those probabilities by the number of respondents to obtain fitted counts. Finally we combined everything into a data frame to easily compare observed and fitted values.

We can use a rootogram to visualize the fit of a count regression model.

### Count data and GLMs: choosing among Poisson, negative binomial, and zero-inflated models

The rootogram function in the countreg package makes this easy. The red curved line is the theoretical Poisson fit. A bar hanging below 0 indicates underfitting. A bar hanging above 0 indicates overfitting. The counts have been transformed with a square root transformation to prevent smaller counts from getting obscured and overwhelmed by larger counts. We see a great deal of underfitting for counts 2 and higher and massive overfitting for the 1 count.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I'm trying to predict a negative binomial model to a stack of rasters using the predict function in the raster package.

I need to include an offset term to normalize my count variable. I have tried unsuccessfully to get this to work using a method where the offset term is included in the model like this:. The problem is not related to the raster::predict function but rather your data. If you back predict the data you will see that it results in uniform values. The issue is that you have a column "offset" named the same as a function "stats::offset. Learn more.

Predicting a negative binomial model to a raster with an offset term Ask Question.

### GLM with count, binary, and proportional data

Asked 4 years, 1 month ago. Active 4 years, 1 month ago. Viewed times. I have tried unsuccessfully to get this to work using a method where the offset term is included in the model like this: condor. Any suggestions for how to do this correctly? Holly Copeland Holly Copeland 31 1 1 bronze badge. Welcome to SO. Do you have a reproducible example for your question?

Please include some sample data with your question to make it easier to help. Also, the more minimal the example the better. Use only columns necessary to reproduce the problem. What does this return: str offset? Active Oldest Votes. Jeffrey Evans Jeffrey Evans 2, 9 9 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.

The Overflow Blog. The Overflow How many jobs can be done at home?Obtains predictions and optionally estimates standard errors of those predictions from a fitted generalized linear model object. If omitted, the fitted linear predictors are used. The default is on the scale of the linear predictors; the alternative "response" is on the scale of the response variable.

The "terms" option returns a matrix giving the fitted values of each term in the model formula on the linear predictor scale.

If omitted, that returned by summary applied to the object is used. A character vector specifies which terms are to be returned. The default is to predict NA. If newdata is omitted the predictions are based on the data used for the fit. In that case how cases with missing values in the original fit is determined by the na.

If na. See also napredict. If se. Variables are first looked for in newdata and then searched for in the usual way which will include the environment of the formula used in the fit. A warning will be given if the variables found are not of the same length as those in newdata if it was supplied. The value of this argument can be abbreviated. A scalar giving the square root of the dispersion used in computing the standard errors.Negative binomial regression is for modeling count variables, usually for over-dispersed count outcome variables.

This page uses the following packages. Make sure that you can load them before trying to run the examples on this page. If you do not have a package installed, run: install. Please note: The purpose of this page is to show how to use various data analysis commands. It does not cover all aspects of the research process which researchers are expected to do.

In particular, it does not cover data cleaning and checking, verification of assumptions, model diagnostics or potential follow-up analyses.

Example 1. School administrators study the attendance behavior of high school juniors at two schools. Predictors of the number of days of absence include the type of program in which the student is enrolled and a standardized test in math. Example 2. A health-related researcher is studying the number of hospital visits in past 12 months by senior citizens in a community based on the characteristics of the individuals and the types of health plans under which each one is covered.

The response variable of interest is days absent, daysabs. The variable math gives the standardized math score for each student. The variable prog is a three-level nominal variable indicating the type of instructional program in which the student is enrolled. It is always a good idea to start with descriptive statistics and plots. Each variable has valid observations and their distributions seem quite reasonable.

The unconditional mean of our outcome variable is much lower than its variance. The table below shows the average numbers of days absent by program type and seems to suggest that program type is a good candidate for predicting the number of days absent, our outcome variable, because the mean value of the outcome appears to vary by prog. The variances within each level of prog are higher than the means within each level. These are the conditional means and variances.

These differences suggest that over-dispersion is present and that a Negative Binomial model would be appropriate. Below is a list of some analysis methods you may have encountered. Some of the methods listed are quite reasonable, while others have either fallen out of favor or have limitations.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It only takes a minute to sign up.

I have an over-dispersed count dataset and I want to add an offset to my negative binomial on the RHS to create a rate of events for y see this great answer for further explanation.

Next, I want to create a predicted plot of my results. However, after following examples from smarter folks than myself, I get strange fitted values from the predict function depending on where I put the offset on in my model. In the first model, I omit the offset, just for a baseline check.

But this defeats the purpose of creating a rate interpretation:. The problem arises in the second model when I add the offset log z inside the formula.

In fumbling around, I also moved the offset outside of the formula, but this converts the offset to a weights function across the whole model, where the z is now weighting across both y and x :. In calculating the coefficients from m2. I've spent many hours going over this problem and the data, simplifying down to this example.

I'm not sure what's going on here. I have about 25 variables that I want to fit and this problem arises in all of them. I'm open to a better way of doing this too if you have any suggestions. No, they're not. The predictions are for the expected frequency of events, not for the rate of events. The only correct model is m2. To get the predicted rate, you need. You should quickly abandon these models! Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.

Predict function on negative binomial produces strange fitted values when adding an offset Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 9 months ago. Active 2 years, 9 months ago.

Viewed 1k times. Thanks in advance for the answer! Tim Tim 3 4 4 bronze badges. Active Oldest Votes.

Gordon Smyth Gordon Smyth 6, 13 13 silver badges 32 32 bronze badges.

## One thought on “Glm nb predict”